Stewardship
Active ownership is an integral part of our long-term responsible investment approach. It is central to our philosophy, beliefs and processes. Through voting and engagement, we aim to protect and ultimately enhance value in the companies and other issuers we invest in – increasing the climate resilience of our client's investments.
Understanding how these companies and issuers manage their environmental impact, operate and interact with stakeholders help us highlight key ESG risks and opportunities. As investors, we can then encourage positive behaviour, promote high standards, and ensure that the interests of all stakeholders are taken into consideration.
Our approach to stewardship
Our approach to stewardship is moderated by our team of ESG specialists and consists of the four key stages below:
|
|
|
|
Why does engagement matter?
As a asset manager, we engage with issuers from around the world to protect and enhance the long-term value of our client's investments.
Meeting and engaging with companies on issues such as the delivery of corporate strategy, financial and non-financial performance and risks, allocation of capital and management of ESG issues help us achieve the best practice.
Our engagement objectives
- Improve our understanding of a company and its strategy
- Monitor company performance
- Support or raise concerns about company management, performance or direction
- Promote good practices
Further information is available in our Engagement Policy.
Over
2,300 ESG issues raised
Source: HSBC Asset Management as at December 31, 2020
Why does voting matter?
Exercising voting rights at company meetings is an important part of stewardship. We believe that high standards of corporate governance deliver sustainable returns to shareholders. Being able to vote encourages adherence to international and local best practice standards of governance, social practice and environmental sustainability. We aim to vote on all equities for which clients have given us authority.
Our global voting guidelines
Our voting guidelines help us hold companies with poor corporate governance standards to account. These guidelines prioritise the following issues:
- Independent and diverse representation on the board, and in board committees
- Remuneration linked to challenging performance criteria with full disclosure
- Dilution of existing shareholders
- ‘Poison Pills’ and reductions in equal voting
- Auditor independence
- Transparency through shareholder proposals
Over |
Over |
Over |